Kyoto Planetbrought to you by
 
report Register for our Action Newsletter and view The Sustainable Enterprise Report online for FREE!
 

TOPICS

SOLUTIONS

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

White Paper

The Green Building Imperative

By Dr. Joseph Romm | Center for Energy and Climate Solutions

Understanding the impact of workplaces on the environment.

The Time is Now for Green Buildings

Corporate environmental sustainability initiatives are more valuable and necessary today than ever before, thanks to five major reasons: compelling evidence of human-induced climate change, escalating costs of energy, imminent regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, stakeholder-driven environmental reporting mandates, and the positive financial returns that make environmental sustainability a sound business practice.

The first reason, clear and compelling evidence of global climate change, includes documented record increases in numbers of major weather-related disasters and wildfires, receding polar ice caps, and a rise of ocean levels that threatens vast populations and current coastal landmasses. Such evidence is driving corporations and federal agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 50 percent over the next 30 years. To achieve that goal, they must take action now.

Caps on carbon dioxide emissions are now a matter of when, not if, and will continue to drive the cost of nonrenewable energy higher, not lower.

The second reason is that energy prices have reached record levels (cited by U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, January 2008) and continue to escalate due to the increased demand of an expanded global economy. Energy economists warn that after 2015, the global supplies of gas and oil will be insufficient to keep up with demand-a trend projected to further increase energy prices and organizations' operating costs.

Third, caps on carbon dioxide emissions are now a matter of when, not if, and will continue to drive the cost of nonrenewable energy higher, not lower. The U.S. Senate is poised to vote in 2008 on a 70 percent cut in carbon emissions with interim goals set for 2020 (Senate Bill S.2191, also known as the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act).

The fourth reason is that investors are pressuring the world's largest companies to disclose carbon emissions. In 2007, the Carbon Disclosure Project compelled more than a third of the companies in the Fortune 500 to disclose carbon emissions as a factor of their revenue, and it is becoming a fundamental valuation criteria and measure for investors. The fifth, and perhaps most compelling reason, is simply this: environmental sustainability makes good business sense. Corporations such as GE, Johnson & Johnson, IBM, Wal-Mart and Nike have achieved tremendous returns on their investments in green strategies that reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Many companies are achieving yield life-cycle savings of as much as ten times their initial investment.

Buildings Generate Nearly Half of All Greenhouse Gas Emissions

For most corporations and federal agencies, buildings are the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases and represent the best opportunity for corporations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent over the next thirty years. The U.S. Energy Information Administration reports that buildings account for a staggering 48% of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Green buildings not only reduce the environmental impacts of natural resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, they also provide economical benefits, such as reduced costs, improved bottom-line performance, and increased shareholder value. Green buildings also improve worker productivity, which in turn improves financial performance. The net result is that organizations reduce costs an average of $1 per square foot of building space and increase revenue by $10 per square foot based on improved worker productivity alone.

Green buildings provide proven returns across the triple bottom line: profit, planet, and people, especially in operating costs and shareholder value.

Investment in environmentally sustainable buildings provides significant and compelling returns, which include environmental, financial, and societal benefits. Corporations and federal agencies have begun to recognize such rewards and have successfully implemented three critical strategies to achieve environmental sustainability through workplace (building) management:

Need for an Integrated Environmental Management System

Corporations and public organizations today understand the benefits and returns of green buildings and have set aggressive environmental sustainability goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the next three to five years. Some have already implemented building retrofits for existing buildings and sustainable development of new buildings and have invested millions of dollars at a premium.

Very few organizations, however, can effectively measure and manage their actual progress to these goals. They miss critical opportunities to reduce environmental impact and increase financial returns because they lack an effective system to identify environmental opportunities. Instead they depend upon manual processes that are time-consuming, data-intensive, and complex to collect massive amounts of data across multiple geographies, locations, and data sources. These manual-oriented approaches are inefficient and ineffective, and often result in inaccurate information, and miscalculated savings and costs of environmental programs. As a result, organizations lack the critical information they need to select and implement the right environmental programs and to accurately monitor and effectively manage performance to their goals.

Implementing the right environmental management system has become a critical component to achieve environmental sustainability. Organizations that do not consider and implement a system as part of their overall strategy struggle to achieve their goals. Products such as TRIRIGA Real Estate Environmental Sustainability (TREES) automate and consolidate energy and emissions data, then measure, manage, and reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas production of workplace operations and assets.

Corporations realize the importance of buildings to achieve environmental sustainability goals. Buildings are the largest consumer of energy and the largest producer of carbon emissions and therefore provide the best opportunity to reduce environmental impact. Green buildings also provide proven returns across the triple bottom line: profit, planet, and people, especially in operating costs and shareholder value as energy prices continue to escalate and carbon restrictions are mandated. An environmental management system for workplace assets and operations has become a critical component to achieve environmental sustainability goals.

Environmental metrics show a company where it stands. Data and indicators are critical to fact-based decision-making and sound environmental management. They drive continuous improvement and allow managers to mark progress against pollution control and resource productivity goals. Sustainability is more a journey than a destination, but it still pays to know where you are on the path.
- Daniel Esty and Andrew Winston, in Green To Gold


 

1. Building retrofits and renovations. Such activity is now widespread, resulting from a number of environmental sustainability initiatives geared to compel organizations to target and conduct retrofits for existing buildings. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), for example, developed a five-stage Energy Star process to reduce energy consumption of buildings, which is a key component of the USGBC's LEED-EB (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Buildings) certification process. Energy Star certification resulted in 30 percent less energy use and provided an average initial rate of return of 22 percent among the buildings documented by EPA. On top of energy savings, the sale price and rent value of the Energy Star and LEED-certified buildings increased substantially.

2. Adoption of continuous commissioning. Continuous commissioning was pioneered by the Texas A&M Energy Systems Laboratory and serves to monitor the whole-building measurements of energy consumption on a periodic basis. Building management systems monitor and record energy consumption, and when combined with a building retrofit, they create substantial ongoing energy savings with continuous operations and maintenance processes in place. Texas A&M demonstrated 25 percent savings of total building energy use as a direct result of continuous commissioning.

3. Sustainable design with new construction. The modern trend of sustainable design creates new buildings optimized with energy-efficient technology from the drawing board on. The financial benefits of constructing new sustainable buildings are enormous. A recent study conducted by Capital E for a dozen California state agencies revealed savings as high as $65 per square foot over twenty years through sustainable design. Energy savings alone, according to the study, amount to about $5.80 per square foot and operational/maintenance savings amount to another $8.50 per square foot. Other areas, including emissions savings, productivity/health values, water usage, and costs of building green factored into the final range of $49.90 to $66.30 per square foot.

 


For more of Dr. Joseph Romm's thought leadership check out his Webinar  "Understanding the Impact of Workplace Assets and Operations on the Environment"

 

Dr. Joseph Romm is executive director of the Center for Energy and Climate Solutions—a one-stop shop that helps businesses and government agencies adopt high-leverage strategies for saving energy and cutting pollution. He is the author of Cool Companies: How the Best Businesses Boost Profits and Productivity. He served as acting assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in 1997 and principal deputy assistant secretary from 1995 though 1998. Joseph holds a Ph.D. in physics from M.I.T., and is on the board of the United States Green Building Council (USGBC).

*Footnotes